Does Information Acquisition Alleviate Market Anomalies? Categorization Bias in Stock Splits
Dongmin Kong,
Chen Lin and
Shasha Liu
Review of Finance, 2019, vol. 23, issue 1, 245-277
Abstract:
Using a unique proprietary account-level trading dataset in China, we investigate how active information acquisition alleviates price-based return comovement, a typical anomaly in stock splits. We find that: 1) individual trading drives the comovement and the trading correlation between split stocks and the low-price portfolio increases significantly after splits; 2) individuals can learn the firm fundamentals through information acquisition, which effectively alleviates their categorized bias; and 3) the role of information acquisition is more significant in environments characterized by greater uncertainty. Our results are robust to different specifications and alternative measures. Taken together, this paper emphasizes the important role of information acquisition in alleviating behavioral bias and improving decision-making.
Keywords: Information acquisition; Comovement; Investor trading behavior; Stock splits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G02 G11 G14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfx028 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revfin:v:23:y:2019:i:1:p:245-277.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Finance is currently edited by Marcin Kacperczyk
More articles in Review of Finance from European Finance Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().