Did You See What I Saw? Interpreting Others’ Forecasts When Their Information Is Unknown
Anthony M Kwasnica,
Raisa Velthuis and
Review of Finance, 2019, vol. 23, issue 2, 325-361
We conduct a series of forecasting experiments to examine how people update their beliefs upon observing others’ forecasts. Subjects exhibit “cursedness,” that is, a propensity to underestimate the link between others’ forecasts and others’ information, which causes subjects to underreact. The behavior of sophisticated subjects is not affected by the framing of information, but unsophisticated subjects switch from underreaction to overreaction when they are only provided qualitative (rather than quantitative) forecast information. Our results have important implications for the way that financial analysts aggregate information and the way that financial institutions present forecasts to their clients.
Keywords: Forecasts; Information aggregation; Rational expectations; Financial analysts; Cursedness; False consensus effect; Framing effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revfin:v:23:y:2019:i:2:p:325-361.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Finance is currently edited by Josef ZechnerEditor-Name: Marco Pagano
More articles in Review of Finance from European Finance Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().