 Bear Beta or Speculative Beta?—Reconciling the Evidence on Downside Risk PremiumTong Wang Review of Finance, 2023, vol. 27, issue 1, 325-367 Abstract: This article develops a new approach to explain why risk factors constructed from index option returns are priced in the stock market. We decompose an option-based factor into three main components and identify the one responsible for the beta–return relationship. Applying this method to the bear risk factor proposed by Lu and Murray reveals that the negative correlation between bear betas and stock returns does not reflect systematic risk premia. Instead, it represents an anomaly closely related to the betting-against-beta puzzle. We trace the root of this anomaly to disagreement concerning the aggregate stock market. Our work reconciles the conflicting evidence concerning downside risk by showing that neither ex-post nor ex-ante downside risk is priced in the cross-section of stocks while making a methodological contribution that facilitates more accurate interpretation of option-based risk factors in future research. Keywords: Downside risk; Disaster risk; Option return; Low-risk anomaly; Mispricing; Disagreement (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revfin:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:325-367. Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Review of Finance is currently edited by Marcin Kacperczyk More articles in Review of Finance from European Finance Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.