Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Mitchell Petersen
The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, vol. 22, issue 1, 435-480
Abstract:
In corporate finance and asset pricing empirical work, researchers are often confronted with panel data. In these data sets, the residuals may be correlated across firms or across time, and OLS standard errors can be biased. Historically, researchers in the two literatures have used different solutions to this problem. This paper examines the different methods used in the literature and explains when the different methods yield the same (and correct) standard errors and when they diverge. The intent is to provide intuition as to why the different approaches sometimes give different answers and give researchers guidance for their use. The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3763)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhn053 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:22:y:2009:i:1:p:435-480
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Financial Studies is currently edited by Itay Goldstein
More articles in The Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().