Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions

Narasimhan Jegadeesh and Woojin Kim ()

The Review of Financial Studies, 2010, vol. 23, issue 2, 901-937

Abstract: This article develops and implements a new test to investigate whether sell-side analysts herd around the consensus when they make stock recommendations. Our empirical results support the herding hypothesis. Stock price reactions following recommendation revisions are stronger when the new recommendation is away from the consensus than when it is closer to it, indicating that the market recognizes analysts' tendency to herd. We find that analysts from larger brokerages, analysts following stocks with smaller dispersion across recommendations, and analysts who make less frequent revisions are more likely to herd. The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org., Oxford University Press.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (112)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhp093 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:23:y:2010:i:2:p:901-937

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Financial Studies is currently edited by Itay Goldstein

More articles in The Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().