EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Wage Rigidity: A Quantitative Solution to Several Asset Pricing Puzzles

Jack Favilukis and Xiaoji Lin

The Review of Financial Studies, 2016, vol. 29, issue 1, 148-192

Abstract: In standard production models, wage volatility is far too high, and equity volatility is far too low. A simple modification–sticky wages because of infrequent resetting together with a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) production function leads to both smoother wages and higher equity volatility. Further, the model produces several other hard-to-explain features of financial data: high Sharpe ratios, low and smooth interest rates, time-varying equity volatility and premium, a value premium, and a downward-sloping equity term structure. Procyclical, volatile wages are a hedge for firms in standard models; smoother wages act like operating leverage, making profits and dividends riskier. Received July 30, 2013; accepted July 6, 2015 by Editor Geert Bekaert.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhv041 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:29:y:2016:i:1:p:148-192.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Financial Studies is currently edited by Itay Goldstein

More articles in The Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:29:y:2016:i:1:p:148-192.