Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools
Concentrating on the fall of the labor share
Lin Cong,
Zhiguo He (),
Jiasun Li and
Wei Jiang
The Review of Financial Studies, 2021, vol. 34, issue 3, 1191-1235
Abstract:
The rise of centralized mining pools for risk sharing does not necessarily undermine the decentralization required for blockchains: because of miners’ cross-pool diversification and pool managers’ endogenous fee setting, larger pools better internalize their externality on global hash rates, charge higher fees, attract disproportionately fewer miners, and grow more slowly. Instead, mining pools as a financial innovation escalate miners’ arms race and significantly increase the energy consumption of proof-of-work-based blockchains. Empirical evidence from Bitcoin mining supports our model’s predictions. The economic insights inform other consensus protocols and the industrial organization of mainstream sectors with similar characteristics but ambiguous prior findings.
JEL-codes: D43 D81 G23 L11 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (48)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhaa040 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:3:p:1191-1235.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Financial Studies is currently edited by Itay Goldstein
More articles in The Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().