Underestimation of Portfolio Insurance and the Crash of October 1987
Charles J Jacklin,
Allan W Kleidon and
Paul Pfleiderer
The Review of Financial Studies, 1992, vol. 5, issue 1, 35-63
Abstract:
The authors examine market crashes in the multiperiod framework of Glosten and Milgrom (1985). Their analysis shows that if the market's prior beliefs underestimate the extent of dynamic hedging strategies such as portfolio insurance, then the price will be greater than that which would be implied by fundamentals if the extent of portfolio insurance were known with certainty. Over time, the market learns of the amount of portfolio insurance, and consequently reevaluates the previous inferences drawn from purchases that were erroneously regarded as based on favorable information. The result is that the price falls when the amount of portfolio insurance is revealed. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.
Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/fcgi-bin/jstor/listjournal.fcg/08939454 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:5:y:1992:i:1:p:35-63
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Financial Studies is currently edited by Itay Goldstein
More articles in The Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().