Ontological Security and Japan’s Ideological Debate over Compensating Wartime ‘Comfort Women’
Naoko Kumagai
Social Science Japan Journal, 2015, vol. 18, issue 2, 146-161
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the absence of a constructive dialogue about the issue of comfort women in Japan between conservatives and liberals in spite of their respective clear concerns about the issue as part of Japan’s war responsibility. With the case of the Asian Women’s Fund’s atonement project for former comfort women, this paper suggests that both sides’ ontological insecurity controlled their interpretations of the issue and that both sides failed to understand a new notion of Japan, as proposed by the Asian Women’s Fund, in which both the Japanese government and Japanese people constitute a new public entity and act jointly to render atonement to the victims. Hardline conservatives, giving special attention to Japan’s honor, took umbrage at any atonement for former comfort women, arguing that many worked voluntarily, while anti-Fund liberals, as survivors’ representatives, guarded against any revisionist and patriarchal interpretation of the comfort women issue and persisted in pushing for truly official compensation only by the Japanese government. Hardline conservatives’ rhetoric significantly decreased the credibility of Japan’s attitude toward the issue in the eyes of the victims’ countries, while the anti-Fund liberals, by focusing their criticism against the Fund, failed to face their real rivals, hardline conservatives.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyv009 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:146-161.
Access Statistics for this article
Social Science Japan Journal is currently edited by Kenneth Mori McElwain
More articles in Social Science Japan Journal from University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().