Electoral Rules, Nomination Strategies, and Women’s Representation in Japan and Taiwan

Was Taiwan’s Electoral Reform Good for Women? SNTV, MMM, Gender Quotas, and Female Representation

Chao-Chi Lin and Wan-Ying Yang

Social Science Japan Journal, 2022, vol. 25, issue 1, 101-124

Abstract: Japan and Taiwan conducted similar electoral reforms in 1994 and 2005. Following the transition from the single nontransferable vote (SNTV) to the mixed-member majoritarian (MMM), at the district level, both countries’ numbers of female representatives have increased, contrary to expectations. What, then, explains the increase in Japan’s and Taiwan’s women’s representation at the district level? We argue that electoral systems can only partly explain the variation in female representation and that the critical factor explaining women’s representation is not the women’s electability, but the earlier stage of nomination. This article examines continuity and change in the candidate selection methods of major parties in Japan and Taiwan and identifies factors that may affect the likelihood of women becoming candidates. Although major parties have adopted different nomination strategies following the reforms, the increase in female representatives has been associated with the centralized process, and whether a woman is an incumbent or not is key to her nomination. Moreover, path dependence matters, and given that Taiwan had more female incumbent representatives than Japan under the SNTV, this might explain the differences in the starting point for female representation between Taiwan and Japan when both switched to the MMM and there was a persistent gap between the two countries.

Keywords: electoral rules; party nomination; centralization; women’s representation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyab027 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:101-124.

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science Japan Journal is currently edited by Kenneth Mori McElwain

More articles in Social Science Japan Journal from University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().