Decentralizing Eligibility for a Federal Antipoverty Program: A Case Study for China
Martin Ravallion
The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 23, issue 1, 1-30
Abstract:
In theory, the informational advantage of decentralizing the eligibility criteria for a federal antipoverty program could come at a large cost to the program's performance in reaching the poor nationally. Whether this happens in practice depends on the size of the local-income effect on the eligibility cutoffs. China's Di Bao program provides a case study. Poorer municipalities adopt systematically lower thresholds--roughly negating intercity differences in need for the program and generating considerable horizontal inequity, so that poor families in rich cities fare better. The income effect is not strong enough to undermine the program's overall poverty impact; other factors, including incomplete coverage of those eligible, appear to matter more. Copyright The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the world bank . All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhn023 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:23:y::i:1:p:1-30
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The World Bank Economic Review is currently edited by Eric Edmonds and Nina Pavcnik
More articles in The World Bank Economic Review from World Bank Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().