Learning Dynamics and Support for Economic Reforms: Why Good News Can Be Bad
Sweder van Wijnbergen () and
World Bank Economic Review, 2016, vol. 30, issue 1, 1-23
Support for economic reforms has often shown puzzling dynamics: many reforms that began successfully lost public support. We show that learning dynamics can rationalize this paradox because the process of revealing reform outcomes is an example of sampling without replacement. We show that this concept challenges the conventional wisdom that one should begin by revealing reform winners. It may also lead to situations in which reforms that enjoy both ex ante and ex post majority support will still not come to completion. We use our framework to explain why gradual reforms worked well in China (where successes in Special Economic Zones facilitated further reform), whereas this was much less the case for Latin American and Central and Eastern European countries.
Keywords: D72; D83; P21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Learning dynamics and support for economic reforms: why good news can be bad (2014)
Working Paper: Learning Dynamics and the Support for Economic Reforms: Why Good News can be Bad (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:30:y:2016:i:1:p:1-23.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
World Bank Economic Review is currently edited by Jaime de Melo
More articles in World Bank Economic Review from World Bank Group Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().