An Income contingent Loan for Extending Paid Parental Leave

Tim Higgins () and Bruce Chapman

Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), 2009, vol. 12, issue 2, 197-216

Abstract: On Mother’s Day, May 10, 2009, the federal government announced an 18 week paid maternity leave scheme to be funded by taxpayers would be introduced in January 2011. This followed a one year review process beginning with the Productivity Commission (PC) being asked to enquire into the social and economic policy issue of paid parental leave (PPL). A case for government subsidy of PPL can be made on the basis that the social benefits exceed the advantages accruing directly to families. In this paper it is argued that there is scope to extend the 18 week grants based leave policy with significant contributions coming from the households assisted, which is an implicit recognition that there are important private benefits from accessing relatively long periods of parental leave. It is explained that commercial banks will not provide funds in the presence of loan repayment uncertainty, a situation quite similar to the market failure inherent with respect to the financing of tuition for higher education. However, an income contingent loan (ICL), similar to HECS, could be used as an optional supplement to the recently announced taxpayer funded scheme, and this idea has cautious but clear support in the PC’s final report. Moral hazard and adverse selection are critical policy issues and these are addressed in the scheme design by: restricting loan duration and size; restricting eligibility to parents with workforce attachment; reducing minimum repayment thresholds to below those of HECS; imposing a loan surcharge, and; making the debt an obligation of both parents. We present simulations of debt, repayment and subsidies for different households. The results show that an optional top-up ICL would not require contributions from taxpayers, yet would introduce flexibility and choice, and provide consumption-smoothing and fair lifetime income distribution outcomes.

Keywords: Structure and Scope of Government: General Fiscal Policies and Behaviour of Economic Agents: Household; Labour Economics Policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H10 H31 J08 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ftprepec.drivehq.com/ozl/journl/downloads/AJLE122chaphiggins.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ozl:journl:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:197-216

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE) from Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sandie Rawnsley ().