Measuring Worker Disincentives: Taxes, Benefits and the Transition into Employment
Rachel Ong ViforJ and
Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), 2011, vol. 14, issue 3, 265-288
Disincentives to employment participation arising from the tax-benefit system have been a major concern for welfare reform. Data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey are used to generate and test the robustness of three commonly used disincentive measures for non-working Australians: effective marginal tax rates, replacement rates and participation tax rates. The results of transition models suggest financial disincentives as measured in the current period have a large effect on employment outcomes one year later, and the replacement rate is the preferred measure for modelling disincentives facing the unemployed. While attracting most attention in the welfare-to-work debate, effective marginal tax rates are found to be an inappropriate measure of work disincentives facing the non-employed.
Keywords: Welfare and Poverty; Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; Unemployment Models; Duration; Incidence and Job Search; Time Allocation; Labour Supply (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I38 J22 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ozl:journl:v:14:y:2011:i:3:p:265-288
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE) from Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sandie Rawnsley ().