 Will Restructuring Hungarian Companies Innovate&questJohn P Bonin and
Istvan Abel
Comparative Economic Studies, 1998, vol. 40, issue 2, 53-74 Abstract: Based on insights from Joseph Berliner's work on innovation in the Soviet centrally planned economy and its reform variants, we analyze process innovation (technological development) and product development in restructuring Humngarian companies from 1992 to 1995. Using data from a survey questionaire responded to by 325 Hungarian companies, we conclude that decision-makers recognize the increasing uncertainty in their business environment and respond to it by taking more aggressive strategies. However, Hungarian companies practice product imitation rather than product development as only about a third of new products introduced are new to either Hungarian or global markets. Furthermore, although technological development is recognized as important, only about a third of the respondents indicate any improvement in the company s technology and, of these, only about a quarter report that the change resulted in an up-to-date technology. Berliner identifies public ownership as a major impediment to innovation and considers the invisible foot of market competition to be a signiifcant incentive for innovation. From cross tabulations of responses to various questions probing a company s implementation of new production processes, we find that foreign-owned companies are more likely to be involved in such activity and, of all companies engaged in process innovation, state-owned companies find it less profitable that do companies of other ownership types. Regarding research and product development, we find that state-owned companies spend significantly less on applied research than do foreign-owned firms. Measuring exposure to external market competition by export intensity in a sub-sample of the companies, we find that a company with higher export intensity is more likely to introduce minor technological improvements. Although ownership type is not a significant determinant of export intensity, state-owned companies tend to adjust their product lines in foreign markets to compete to compete with other Hungarian companies. Global market competition promotes minor technological development and makes state-owned companies more conscious of product development while public ownership deters process innovation in Hungary. Hence, in transition economies, the imitation stage comes first as restructuring companies try to catch up to world class standards in both technologies and products; however preventing foreign participation in the privatization process is likely to impede and stall company restructuring. Date: 1998 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:compes:v:40:y:1998:i:2:p:53-74 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Comparative Economic Studies is currently edited by Nauro Campos More articles in Comparative Economic Studies from Palgrave Macmillan, Association for Comparative Economic Studies Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.