The Effect of Health Insurance Benefit Mandates on Premiums
James Bailey ()
Eastern Economic Journal, 2013, vol. 40, issue 1, 119-127
This paper examines the effects of laws mandating that health insurance cover specific conditions, procedures, providers, and beneficiaries. Unlike previous work, this paper considers the market for employer-based health insurance rather than the much smaller individual market, and uses a panel data approach to account for unobserved heterogeneity among states. Using a fixed effects model, I find that the average mandate increases premiums by 0.44–1.11 percent annually. This implies that new mandates were responsible for 9–23 percent of all premium increases over the 1996–2011 period.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v40/n1/pdf/eej201316a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v40/n1/full/eej201316a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:easeco:v:40:y:2013:i:1:p:119-127
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Eastern Economic Journal is currently edited by Allan Zebedee and Cynthia Bansak
More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Palgrave Macmillan, Eastern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().