Bank Capital Regulation: Theory, Empirics, and Policy
Shekhar Aiyar,
Charles Calomiris and
Tomasz Wieladek
IMF Economic Review, 2015, vol. 63, issue 4, 955-983
Abstract:
Minimum equity ratio requirements promote bank stability, but compliance must be measured credibly and requirements must be commensurate with risk. A mix of higher book equity requirements, a carefully designed contingent capital requirement, cash reserve requirements, and other measures, would address prudential objectives better than book equity requirements alone. Basel III’s ill-defined liquidity ratios, book capital ratios, and internal models of risk must be replaced by a system of credible, incentive-robust rules that combine valid concepts with objective, market-based information into a simplified and credible regulatory process. Raising minimum capital requirements will not be socially costless; bank profitability, share prices, and loan supply are likely to suffer. But avoiding the dramatic consequences of banking crises would more than repay those costs.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/imfer/journal/v63/n4/pdf/imfer201518a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/imfer/journal/v63/n4/full/imfer201518a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:imfecr:v:63:y:2015:i:4:p:955-983
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/41308/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in IMF Economic Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Monetary Fund
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().