Moral Hazard Misconceptions: The Case of the Greenspan Put
Gideon Bornstein and
Additional contact information
Gideon Bornstein: Northwestern University
IMF Economic Review, 2018, vol. 66, issue 2, 251-286
Abstract Policy discussions on financial regulation tend to assume that whenever a corrective policy is used ex post to ameliorate the effects of a crisis, there are negative side effects in terms of moral hazard ex ante. This paper shows that this is not a general theoretical prediction, focusing on the case of monetary policy interventions ex post. In particular, we show that if the central bank does not intervene by monetary easing following a crisis, an aggregate demand externality makes borrowing ex ante inefficient. If instead the central bank follows the optimal discretionary policy and intervenes to stabilize asset prices and real activity, we show examples in which the aggregate demand externality disappears, reducing the need for ex ante intervention.
JEL-codes: E44 E50 G18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41308-018-0052-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Moral Hazard Misconceptions: the Case of the Greenspan Put (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:imfecr:v:66:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1057_s41308-018-0052-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/41308/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in IMF Economic Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Monetary Fund
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().