Peer Effects in Central Banking
IMF Economic Review, 2020, vol. 68, issue 4, No 2, 764-814
Abstract We provide a new explanation for why central banks have become transparent over the last three decades. We apply recently developed social interaction panel regression models for the observational data, which allow the identification of peer effects. The identification is based on variations in the past monetary policy regime exogenously determined with respect to transparency. Previous literature has argued that domestic factors such as macroeconomic stability were behind the trend toward greater transparency. In contrast, our results indicate that transparency primarily increased because of a favorable global environment and, importantly, because of the peer effects among central bankers. Central bankers thus learned from each other’s experiences regarding transparency.
Keywords: C31; D83; E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41308-020-00121-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Peer Effects in Central Banking (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:imfecr:v:68:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1057_s41308-020-00121-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/41308/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in IMF Economic Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Monetary Fund
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().