EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Methodological Delimitations for Information Quality Provided by Patrimonial Evaluation

Daniel Goagără and Laura Giurca Vasilescu
Additional contact information
Daniel Goagără: University of Craiova, Romania

Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, 2009, vol. 9, issue 1, 287-292

Abstract: The evaluation methods for an entity are multiple (patrimonial methods, income based methods, direct comparison methods) and the evaluators have to establish exactly which one of these are the most appropriate for the analyzed entity, as well as for the assets which are going to be evaluated, in a specific economic context. The selection of a certain type of approach or method depends on different aspects, such as: the type of entity, the situation at the evaluation period, the available information, the purpose of evaluation, etc. The evaluation standards recommend that the evaluators should use at least two from the three approaches: asset based approach; income based approach; comparison based approach. Each type of approach has several evaluation methods and techniques and between them there is a continuous inter-conditioning.

Keywords: evaluation methods; patrimonial evaluation; evaluation standards; relevant information; performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2009/20090135.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pet:annals:v:9:i:1:y:2009:p:287-292

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics from University of Petrosani, Romania
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Imola Driga ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:9:i:1:y:2009:p:287-292