Investment, Growth, and Uniformity versus Selectivity in Capital Income Taxation: Testing the King-Fullerton Framework
Massimo Florio () and
Carlo Fiorio ()
Public Finance = Finances publiques, 2008, vol. 55, issue 1-2, 64-81
This paper criticises the view that deviations from uniformity in capital taxation, as measured by dispersion of effective marginal tax rates in the King-Fullerton (1984) framework, are always undesirable. International evidence shows a consistent pattern of tax selectivity. We argue that in presence of investment externalities, particularly in the case of machinery, some degree of tax discrimination may be justified. Moreover, there is no evidence that standard deviations of effective tax wedges and investment or growth are inversely correlated. Troubles arise not with the method in itself, but with a less than careful use of its results for policy conclusions.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pfi:pubfin:v:55:y:2008:i:1-2:p:64-81
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Public Finance = Finances publiques
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().