A distributed approach to the regulation of clinical AI
Trishan Panch,
Erin Duralde,
Heather Mattie,
Gopal Kotecha,
Leo Anthony Celi,
Melanie Wright and
Felix Greaves
PLOS Digital Health, 2022, vol. 1, issue 5, 1-8
Abstract:
Regulation is necessary to ensure the safety, efficacy and equitable impact of clinical artificial intelligence (AI). The number of applications of clinical AI is increasing, which, amplified by the need for adaptations to account for the heterogeneity of local health systems and inevitable data drift, creates a fundamental challenge for regulators. Our opinion is that, at scale, the incumbent model of centralized regulation of clinical AI will not ensure the safety, efficacy, and equity of implemented systems. We propose a hybrid model of regulation, where centralized regulation would only be required for applications of clinical AI where the inference is entirely automated without clinician review, have a high potential to negatively impact the health of patients and for algorithms that are to be applied at national scale by design. This amalgam of centralized and decentralized regulation we refer to as a distributed approach to the regulation of clinical AI and highlight the benefits as well as the pre-requisites and challenges involved.
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000040 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/fi ... 00040&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000040
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000040
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS Digital Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by digitalhealth ().