An experimental machine learning study investigating the decision-making process of students and qualified radiographers when interpreting radiographic images

Clare Rainey, Angelina T Villikudathil, Jonathan McConnell, Ciara Hughes, Raymond Bond and Sonyia McFadden

PLOS Digital Health, 2023, vol. 2, issue 10, 1-14

Abstract: AI is becoming more prevalent in healthcare and is predicted to be further integrated into workflows to ease the pressure on an already stretched service. The National Health Service in the UK has prioritised AI and Digital health as part of its Long-Term Plan. Few studies have examined the human interaction with such systems in healthcare, despite reports of biases being present with the use of AI in other technologically advanced fields, such as finance and aviation. Understanding is needed of how certain user characteristics may impact how radiographers engage with AI systems in use in the clinical setting to mitigate against problems before they arise. The aim of this study is to determine correlations of skills, confidence in AI and perceived knowledge amongst student and qualified radiographers in the UK healthcare system. A machine learning based AI model was built to predict if the interpreter was either a student (n = 67) or a qualified radiographer (n = 39) in advance, using important variables from a feature selection technique named Boruta. A survey, which required the participant to interpret a series of plain radiographic examinations with and without AI assistance, was created on the Qualtrics survey platform and promoted via social media (Twitter/LinkedIn), therefore adopting convenience, snowball sampling This survey was open to all UK radiographers, including students and retired radiographers.Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed that males who were proficient in their profession were more likely than females to trust AI. Trust in AI was negatively correlated with age and with level of experience. A machine learning model was built, the best model predicted the image interpreter to be qualified radiographers with 0.93 area under curve and a prediction accuracy of 93%. Further testing in prospective validation cohorts using a larger sample size is required to determine the clinical utility of the proposed machine learning model.Author summary: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly integrated into healthcare systems. Radiology, as a technologically advanced profession, is one area where AI has proved useful for myriad tasks. Developments in computer vision have allowed for applications in computer aided diagnosis using radiographic images. The integration and development of AI has been supported by healthcare providers and government agencies, such as the NHS in the UK. With the introduction of these systems in the clinical setting it is imperative to understand the nuances of the interaction between the clinicians using the technology and the system. Trust has been cited as a potentially significant issue in the effective integration of AI in radiology. Our research pinpoints the factors which have an impact on trust in radiographers and clarifies the strength of these associations. The means of analysis (Boruta) used provides an assessment of any correlations, allowing for intervention to be made. We found that females were less likely to trust AI that males and that trust in AI was negatively correlated with age and level of experience, indicating areas were further investigation and intervention are needed to ensure balanced trust and effective integration of AI in clinical radiography.

Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/fi ... 00229&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000229

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Digital Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by digitalhealth ().