External validation of a paediatric Smart triage model for use in resource limited facilities

Joyce Kigo, Stephen Kamau, Alishah Mawji, Paul Mwaniki, Dustin Dunsmuir, Yashodani Pillay, Cherri Zhang, Katija Pallot, Morris Ogero, David Kimutai, Mary Ouma, Ismael Mohamed, Mary Chege, Lydia Thuranira, Niranjan Kissoon, J Mark Ansermino and Samuel Akech

PLOS Digital Health, 2024, vol. 3, issue 6, 1-16

Abstract: Models for digital triage of sick children at emergency departments of hospitals in resource poor settings have been developed. However, prior to their adoption, external validation should be performed to ensure their generalizability. We externally validated a previously published nine-predictor paediatric triage model (Smart Triage) developed in Uganda using data from two hospitals in Kenya. Both discrimination and calibration were assessed, and recalibration was performed by optimizing the intercept for classifying patients into emergency, priority, or non-urgent categories based on low-risk and high-risk thresholds. A total of 2539 patients were eligible at Hospital 1 and 2464 at Hospital 2, and 5003 for both hospitals combined; admission rates were 8.9%, 4.5%, and 6.8%, respectively. The model showed good discrimination, with area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 0.826, 0.784 and 0.821, respectively. The pre-calibrated model at a low-risk threshold of 8% achieved a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval, (CI):89%-96%), 81% (CI:74%-88%), and 89% (CI:85%–92%), respectively, and at a high-risk threshold of 40%, the model achieved a specificity of 86% (CI:84%–87%), 96% (CI:95%-97%), and 91% (CI:90%-92%), respectively. Recalibration improved the graphical fit, but new risk thresholds were required to optimize sensitivity and specificity.The Smart Triage model showed good discrimination on external validation but required recalibration to improve the graphical fit of the calibration plot. There was no change in the order of prioritization of patients following recalibration in the respective triage categories. Recalibration required new site-specific risk thresholds that may not be needed if prioritization based on rank is all that is required. The Smart Triage model shows promise for wider application for use in triage for sick children in different settings.Author summary: External validation plays a key role in the utilization of prognostic models. We externally validated a previously developed pediatric Smart Triage model developed in Uganda using data from two Kenyan hospitals, which could be used to identify high-risk, priority, and low-risk children presenting at the emergency department. The Smart Triage model showed good discrimination during external validation, but recalibration was needed to improve the calibration plot. Recalibration necessitated the use of new site-specific risk thresholds, but this did not change patient categorization.

Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000293 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/fi ... 00293&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000293

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000293

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Digital Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by digitalhealth ().