Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone-based device (VistaView) for detection of diabetic retinopathy: A prospective study

Rida Shahzad, Arshad Mehmood, Danish Shabbir and M A Rehman Siddiqui

PLOS Digital Health, 2024, vol. 3, issue 11, 1-12

Abstract: Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness globally. The gold standard for DR screening is stereoscopic colour fundus photography with tabletop cameras. VistaView is a novel smartphone-based retinal camera which offers mydriatic retinal imaging. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of the smartphone-based VistaView camera compared to a traditional desk mounted fundus camera (Triton Topcon). We also compare the agreement between graders for DR screening between VistaView images and Topcon images. Methodology: This prospective study took place between December 2021 and June 2022 in Pakistan. Consecutive diabetic patients were imaged following mydriasis using both VistaView and Topcon cameras at the same sitting. All images were graded independently by two graders based on the International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) criteria. Individual grades were assigned for severity of DR and maculopathy in each image. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using the Topcon camera as the gold standard. Agreement between graders for each device was calculated as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (95% CI) and Cohen’s weighted kappa (k). Principal findings: A total of 1428 images were available from 371 patients with both cameras. After excluding ungradable images, a total of 1231 images were graded. The sensitivity of VistaView for any DR was 69.9% (95% CI 62.2–76.6%) while the specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 89.9–95.1%), and PPV and NPV were 80.5% (95% CI 73–86.4%) and 88.1% (95% CI 84.5–90.9) respectively. The sensitivity of VistaView for RDR was 69.7% (95% CI 61.7–76.8%) while the specificity was 94.2% (95% CI 91.3–96.1%), and PPV and NPV were 81.5% (95% CI 73.6–87.6%) and 89.4% (95% CI 86–92%) respectively. The sensitivity for detecting maculopathy in VistaView was 71.2% (95% CI 62.8–78.4%), while the specificity was 86.4% (82.6–89.4%). The PPV and NPV of detecting maculopathy were 63% (95% CI 54.9–70.5%) and 90.1% (95% CI 86.8–92.9%) respectively. For VistaView, the ICC of DR grades was 78% (95% CI, 75–82%) between the two graders and that of maculopathy grades was 66% (95% CI, 59–71%). The Cohen’s kappa for retinopathy grades of VistaView images was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.55–0.67, p

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000649 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/fi ... 00649&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000649

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000649

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Digital Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by digitalhealth ().