 Hierarchy and hope: Exploring AI’s role in medicine through a thematic analysis of online discourseJohan Pushani, Sherwin Rajkumar, Alishya Burrell, Erin Peebles and Amrit Kirpalani PLOS Digital Health, 2026, vol. 5, issue 1, 1-12 Abstract: The healthcare community remains divided on the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine. In this qualitative study, we sought to better understand the perceived opportunities and threats of AI among premedical students, medical students, and physicians. We conducted a thematic analysis on Reddit, a social platform where candid opinions are often shared. Posts from the r/premed, r/medicalschool, and r/medicine subreddits were searched using the terms “AI”, “chatGPT”, “openAI”, and “artificial intelligence”. We analyzed 2403 comments across 47 threads from December 2022 to August 2023. A coding scheme was developed manually following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, and common themes were extracted. The main themes identified centered on AI enhancement versus replacement. Careers perceived to be lower in the medical social hierarchy were considered most at risk of replacement. AI was thought to first replace non-medical jobs, followed by mid-levels, and then primary care and diagnostic specialties, with specialists and surgeons affected last. Some contributors emphasized that AI could never replace a physician’s compassion and nuanced clinical judgment. Others viewed AI as a tool to enhance efficiency, particularly in tasks such as studying, note writing, screening, and triage. Although verifying the credentials of commenters on online forums poses a challenge, platforms like Reddit offer a valuable opportunity to understand nuanced attitudes and perceptions regarding AI in medicine. Online forums allow for a unique understanding of the impressions of AI in medicine. While AI was generally well-received, we identified a key finding: a socially hierarchical, biased form of thinking among healthcare professionals. The perpetuation of this biased mindset may contribute to role devaluation, mistrust, and collaboration challenges within healthcare teams–ultimately impacting patient care. To fully leverage AI’s potential in medicine, it is critical to acknowledge and address potentially biased perceptions within the healthcare community.Author summary: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, like ChatGPT, are rapidly becoming part of healthcare, yet there is still uncertainty about whether AI will primarily support clinicians or replace them. In this study, we analyzed public online discussions to better understand how these groups talk about AI in medicine. Using thematic analysis, we reviewed 2,403 comments across 47 Reddit threads from December 2022 to August 2023. We found two dominant themes. First, many users viewed AI as an enhancement tool, supporting studying, writing, clinical documentation, and early screening or triage - while emphasizing that AI can be inaccurate and requires human oversight. Second, others emphasized AI as a potential replacement force, often predicting a “hierarchy” of job risk where roles perceived as lower in the medical social structure were viewed as more vulnerable to automation than specialist physicians. These findings suggest that opinions about AI are shaped not only by technology, but also by professional identity and hierarchy, factors that may influence collaboration and the equitable implementation of AI in healthcare. Date: 2026 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001212 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001212 Access Statistics for this article More articles in PLOS Digital Health from Public Library of Science |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.