Reliability of a convolutional neural network in segmenting multiple sclerosis lesions from MRI: Impact of data augmentation, image modality and tolerance with U-Net architecture

Adam C Szekely-Kohn, Marco Castellani, Luca Baronti, Zubair Ahmed, William G K Manifold, Michael Douglas and Daniel M Espino

PLOS Digital Health, 2026, vol. 5, issue 4, 1-25

Abstract: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, typically exhibiting radiologically identifiable lesions within the brain and spinal cord, features key to both diagnosis and clinical disease monitoring. Manually identifying and segmenting lesions is both difficult and time consuming, thus optimising approaches to reliably automate segmentation is highly beneficial. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of data augmentation and manipulation on the accuracy of automated lesion segmentation using MRI scans from MS patients. Factors examined include MRI modalities in both isolation and combination, image augmentation, lesion size and size of testing set relative to training. The MICCAI 2016 MS dataset was used in this study, with U-Net chosen as the algorithmic method for segmentation. Each factor was optimised and then combined to maximise segmentation accuracy; the Dice metric was used as the focal metric to assess the efficacy of any given permutation of the setup. Statistical significance was assessed using the Mann–Whitney U-test, with each permutation repeated five to ten times to ensure robustness. The best Dice score achieved using the testing and training dataset as outlined in the MICCAI 2016 challenge rubric was 0.59, approximately a 2% improvement against controls. To achieve this result whilst adhering to the training and testing distribution as defined in the dataset publication, the optimal imaging sequence was determined to be proton density. The augmentation conditions used included implementing an additional rotation of the dataset (doubling it in size) and excluding lesions

Date: 2026
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001316 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/fi ... 01316&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001316

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001316

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Digital Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by digitalhealth ().