The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden

Benjamin Born, Alexander M Dietrich and Gernot Müller

PLOS ONE, 2021, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-13

Abstract: While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3–4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249732 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 49732&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0249732

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249732

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().