Interaction between Markedness and Transfer in English Coda Nasals: Taiwanese Learning English as a Foreign Language

Hsiu-ling Hsu

Studies in Media and Communication, 2013, vol. 1, issue 1, 64-90

Abstract: This paper aims to explore how a transfer effect and an unmarkedness effect interact in Taiwanese EFL (English as a foreign language) learners¡¯ English production, using an Optimality Theoretic approach. My focus is the nasals in syllable coda positions. This study carried out an English production experiment, in which sixty-two participants took part. These participants were 29 Mandarin native speakers (the Mandarin group: MG) and 33 Southern Min native speakers (the Southern Min group: SG). Each participant read 51 test sentences with target coda nasals. There are three major findings in this study: (1) Southern Min speakers have less difficulty with English /m/ than Mandarin speakers do, suggesting a positive transfer of the first language (L1) phonemic system to the second language (L2); (2) there exists a strong tendency toward unmarked coronal [n] in codas found in both MG and SG and there is no phonological rule of [m] or [?] becoming [n] in these learners¡¯ L1, revealing that an unmarkedness effect plays a significant role in shaping the production of interlanguage English with respect to coda nasals; and (3) the preceding two findings reveal that transfer and unmarkedness interact to influence the learning of English coda nasals and that unmarkedness overrides transfer in shaping Taiwanese EFL learners¡¯ English interlanguage, leading to the strong preference for unmarked [n] in phonetic representations.

Keywords: interlanguage phonology; markedness; L1 transfer; coda nasal; Optimality Theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/95/101 (application/pdf)
http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/95 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:64-90

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Studies in Media and Communication from Redfame publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Redfame publishing ().