The fallacy of 'scientific elections' in the COVID-era: exploring the challenges of managing the 2020-2021 elections in Uganda

Norman Sempijja () and Paula Mora Brito ()
Additional contact information
Norman Sempijja: Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Faculty of Governance, Economics and Social Sciences, Ben Guerir, Morocco
Paula Mora Brito: Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Faculty of Governance, Economics and Social Sciences, Ben Guerir, Morocco

Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, 2022, vol. 9, issue 1, 20

Abstract: COVID-19 broke out in the period that Uganda was due to have presidential and parliamentary elections, posing a very precarious human security challenge. The ruling party (National Resistance Movement; NRM) faced the challenge of passing power to the Speaker of parliament if elections were not to be held. To mitigate the public health challenges and maintain power, the government acquiesced to an election process without public campaigns. Instead, campaigns were to be held over the radio, TV, and social media in what came to be known as 'scientific elections.' However, in a country hamstrung by massive political and bureaucratic corruption and an entrenched regime that uses violence against opponents, little attention was paid to the fairness of the process, especially in terms of access to media resources by the opposition. Conversely, as elections are about crowds and showmanship, the Ugandan Electoral Commission struggled with the ever-evolving electoral campaign process, especially as large spontaneous crowds sprang up on the campaign trail of the political candidates. The opposition needs a large crowd for legitimacy and a show of popularity. To mitigate this, the ruling party used violence against opposition members as an excuse to enforce standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the prevention of COVID-19, yet its candidates were left to gather crowds. This radicalized some of the opposition that used media outlets to call for violence and ethnic cleansing. This qualitative study delves into the extent to which the 'scientific elections' process was designed to produce a fair outcome of the 2021 elections in Uganda. This study uses the rational choice theory to explore the calculations of different stakeholders. The study relies on secondary data, especially available in media outlets, but also primary data through reports and social media and speeches of key figures in the political landscape in Uganda. The study finds that the Independent Electoral Commission was caught between two highly sophisticated opponents and did not have the capacity and agency to enforce the rules in the political game. In the end, the key facets of the 'scientific elections' process were found wanting and did not produce a fair outcome of the 2021 elections in Uganda.

Keywords: scientific elections; Uganda; National Resistance Movement; COVID-19; Uganda Electoral Commission; election management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D78 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/2713 Full text (application/pdf)
azybal@sgh.waw.pl

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:spppps:0233

Access Statistics for this article

Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies is currently edited by Andrzej Zybała, Andrzej Klimczuk

More articles in Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies from Warsaw School of Economics Al. Niepodleglosci 162, 02-554 Warszawa. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marcin Ochalski ().