Contractarianism as a Broad Church

Robert Sugden

Rationality, Markets and Morals, 2013, vol. 4, issue 69

Abstract: I defend the claim, made in a previous paper, that ‘a Humean can be a contractarian’, against the criticisms of Anthony de Jasay. Jasay makes a categorical distinction between ‘ordered anarchy’ (which he associates with Hume) and ‘social contract theory’. I argue that Hume’s political position was conservative, not anarchist. On Hume’s analysis, a convention is an implicit agreement; the concept of convention is more general than, rather than distinct from, that of agreement by exchange of promises. Hume justifies political obligation by treating established forms of government as conventions in this sense.

Keywords: contractarianism; social contract theory; Hume; ordered anarchy; convention (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 D7 H2 H4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rmm-journal.de/downloads/Article_Sugden.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rmm:journl:v:4:y:2013:i:69

Access Statistics for this article

Rationality, Markets and Morals is currently edited by Bernd Lahno

More articles in Rationality, Markets and Morals from Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Friederike Pförtner ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).