Using Failure Analysis Learning in Business School Instruction
Gary Oster ()
Additional contact information
Gary Oster: Regent University, USA
REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, 2017, vol. 18, issue 5, 458-466
Abstract:
Most university business schools logically use best practices learning so students may learn professional policies and procedures generally accepted by business and industry as being correct and effective. Whether through tradition, historical precedent, or instructor preference, errors and faults in leaders, systems, or products are rarely considered. Conversely, failure analysis learning is a pedagogical methodology that requires the systematic collection and analysis of information to determine the root causes of a specific failure, and the development and reporting of recommendations to prevent the failure from recurring in the future. Failure analysis learning includes a form of behavioral systems analysis and deals with the unwanted behavior of systems. In most cases, failure analysis learning is composed of five important steps, including data gathering, data analysis, conclusion development, countervailing recommendations, and extrapolation to other circumstances. What differentiates failure analysis learning from other forms of study is that it is widely inclusive of all facts and speculation related to a failure, systematic in the gathering, measurement, and consideration of this information, and thoroughly prescriptive in reporting proposed actions relative to failure prevention. Failure analysis learning includes forensic inquiry utilizing the collection and analysis of data and the use of rigorous scientific methodologies to determine the root causes of failure, and then the intentional extrapolation of findings to other circumstances through the use of analogy and metaphor. Failure analysis learning is most often focused on aircraft, infrastructure, buildings, vehicles, leadership, equipment, processes, etc. As a minimally-guided learning methodology, failure analysis learning is a pedagogically sound tool through which to impart key business concepts.
Keywords: failure; failure learning; failure analysis; disasters; forensics; corporate learning; pedagogy; training; higher education; business schools. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A20 A23 A29 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://rmci.ase.ro/no18vol5/01.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:18:y:2017:i:5:p:458-466
Access Statistics for this article
REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT is currently edited by Marian Nastase
More articles in REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT from Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marian Nastase ().