EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring Discrimination against Females: Is the “Non-Discriminatory†Wage the Male or the Female Wage?

Michael Robinson ()

The American Economist, 1993, vol. 37, issue 1, 45-50

Abstract: Typically, when using Oaxaca's decomposition to measure discrimination against females, either the wage regression for males or the wage regression for females is used as the “non-discriminatory†wage. The appropriate method for estimating discrimination depends upon whether discrimination consists of a bias against females, a bias for males, or some combination of both. This paper uses a wage frontier approach to estimate the “true†wage regression for both males and females. This approach for measuring discrimination does not require the assumption that the “non-discriminatory†wage is either the male or the female wage.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/056943459303700105 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:amerec:v:37:y:1993:i:1:p:45-50

DOI: 10.1177/056943459303700105

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The American Economist from Sage Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2020-06-17
Handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:37:y:1993:i:1:p:45-50