EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Effects of Positive versus Negative Feedback on Rôle Ambiguity

Robert E. Wood and Sukumar Arasu
Additional contact information
Robert E. Wood: The Australian Graduate School of Management.
Sukumar Arasu: The Australian Graduate School of Management.

Australian Journal of Management, 1987, vol. 12, issue 1, 91-101

Abstract: The present study examined the directing, as distinct from the motivational, effects of feedback sign. Rôle ambiguity was chosen as the dependent variable because the directing function of feedback relates directly to the level of task understanding and not, necessarily, to the level of task effort. It was hypothesised that positive feedback would have a stronger directing effect than negative feedback and, therefore, would lead to greater reductions in rôle ambiguity. Survey data were collected from 530 subjects in a variety of jobs in four different Australian organisations. The hypothesised effects were supported. However, multicollinearity between feedback amount and positive feedback reduced the latter to nonsignificance in a model including both variables. Tests for possible moderators showed that positive feedback had a greater effect on rôle ambiguity than did negative feedback for all job types in all organisations. All results were cross validated on two randomly selected sub-samples.

Keywords: FEEDBACK SIGN; FEEDBACK AMOUNT; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; ROLE AMBIGUITY (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628701200107 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:12:y:1987:i:1:p:91-101

DOI: 10.1177/031289628701200107

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:12:y:1987:i:1:p:91-101