Inflation and the Investing Borrower

J. E. Everett
Additional contact information
J. E. Everett: University of Western Australia

Australian Journal of Management, 1977, vol. 2, issue 1, 11-33

Abstract: The Mathews Committee report recommends that assets should be depreciable for tax purposes according to replacement cost rather than historic cost, to compensate for inflation. But there is a reverse side to the argument. Under the present taxation system, part of the interest expense allowed on borrowed funds is really a repayment of capital in times of inflation. This paper examines the two effects quantitatively. It is shown that, for a project financed entirely by borrowings, the extra tax benefit on interest expenses exceeds the extra tax cost on depreciation allowances. If the Mathews Committee recommendations on depreciation are adopted and borrowers are allowed to deduct interest payments in full, then inflationary distortions might be accentuated rather than relieved.

Keywords: DEBT; DEPRECIATION; INFLATION; INVESTMENT; TAXATION (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1977
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289627700200102 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:2:y:1977:i:1:p:11-33

DOI: 10.1177/031289627700200102

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().