Insolvency administration as a strategic response to financial distress
James Routledge and
David Morrison
Additional contact information
James Routledge: Faculty of Business, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
David Morrison: TC Beirne School of law, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Australian Journal of Management, 2012, vol. 37, issue 3, 441-459
Abstract:
This study considers whether the strategic decision to enter voluntary administration (VA) rather than to trade the company’s business for a protracted period of declining performance is systematically related to the effective monitoring of management decision-making. Analysis that tests the association between strategic entry into VA and the likelihood that a company will reorganize in VA is also presented. We find about half of the companies in our sample entered VA as a strategic choice. The likelihood of strategic entry to VA increased with the proportion of independent board directors, the existence of an audit committee and a dual CEO/chair board structure. Subsequent analysis of reorganization outcomes suggests that strategic entry into VA improves prospects for a successful reorganization.
Keywords: corporate governance; financial distress; monitoring; performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0312896211428494 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:37:y:2012:i:3:p:441-459
DOI: 10.1177/0312896211428494
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().