Verifying the Miles and Snow strategy types in Australian small- and medium-size enterprises
Karen Blackmore and
Keith Nesbitt
Additional contact information
Keith Nesbitt: School of Design, Communication and IT, University of Newcastle, Australia
Australian Journal of Management, 2013, vol. 38, issue 1, 171-190
Abstract:
In this paper we set out to verify the existence of Miles and Snow strategy types in Australian small- and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through objective classification. Australian SMEs, in particular, are interesting as they are reported to have some unique characteristics, with as many as 70% following a low growth or life-style pathway. While numerous empirical studies have been conducted to validate the existence and characteristics of the Miles and Snow strategy types in different domains for both larger and smaller enterprises, these studies typically rely on a subjective, ‘self-typing’ approach. In this study we employ a more objective approach by identifying measures from existing survey data that capture the strategic dimensions proposed by Miles and Snow. We use these objective measures in a K -means cluster analysis to identify four different strategic groups. Three of the groups correspond to the three ‘viable’ Miles and Snow strategy types of Defender, Prospector and Analyser; however, we also identify a ‘Static’ strategy type that constitutes 42% of SMEs in the sample.
Keywords: Cluster analysis; Miles and Snow; objective measures; small- and medium-size enterprises; static; strategic typology; strategy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0312896212444692 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:38:y:2013:i:1:p:171-190
DOI: 10.1177/0312896212444692
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().