EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do alternative methods of reporting non-controlling interests really matter?

Ana I Lopes, Isabel Lourenço and Mark Soliman
Additional contact information
Ana I Lopes: Department of Accounting, ISCTE-IUL Business School, Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE-IUL), Portugal
Isabel Lourenço: UNIDE, Department of Accounting, ISCTE-IUL Business School, Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE-IUL), Portugal
Mark Soliman: University of Southern California, USA

Australian Journal of Management, 2013, vol. 38, issue 1, 7-30

Abstract: Researchers have long been interested in whether the classification of various items on the balance sheet matters to investors. This paper provides evidence on whether reporting non-controlling interests (NCI) as equity or as non-equity matters in terms of value relevance. We use a sample of German firms that voluntary adopted International Financial Reporting Standards early. This adoption required them to change their reporting of NCI from the non-equity to the equity portion of the balance sheet. After conducting sensitivity tests for self-selection bias and controlling for weight of NCI, firm size and leverage, our results suggest that NCI are priced by the market in the same manner irrespectively of being reported as equity or non-equity. This finding reinforces the notion that equity markets are efficient in their processing of information, regardless of the classification by standard setters. JEL Classification: M41-Accounting.

Keywords: Changes to standards; consolidated statement of financial position; non-controlling interests; recognition versus disclosure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0312896212458788 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:38:y:2013:i:1:p:7-30

DOI: 10.1177/0312896212458788

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:38:y:2013:i:1:p:7-30