Litigation settlements, litigation stakes, and financial distress costs

Ganapathi S Narayanamoorthy and Hui Zhou
Additional contact information
Ganapathi S Narayanamoorthy: A.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
Hui Zhou: Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia

Australian Journal of Management, 2016, vol. 41, issue 3, 459-483

Abstract: Several theoretical studies provide predictions on the relation between settlement likelihood and litigation stakes. Although models with generalizable settings argue in favor of a negative relation, certain specialized settings predict the opposite. In contrast to the theoretical literature, there is limited empirical analysis of the relation with only one study reporting evidence of a positive association. In this study, we infer how the stock market forms expectations regarding the relation between settlement likelihood and litigation stakes by analyzing stock returns around settlement announcement dates. We find that the market was more surprised when higher stakes lawsuits were settled, suggesting that higher stakes lawsuits were not expected to settle. We thus provide empirical support in favor of general theoretical models on conflict resolution that predict a positive relation between litigation stakes and settlement likelihood. Our results also have implications for studies of financial distress costs. Although we find evidence of the existence of financial distress costs, our results contradict a conclusion drawn in prior research—that the primary benefit of litigation settlements is the unexpected relief from financial distress costs.

Keywords: Litigation settlements; financial distress costs; patent lawsuits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G33 K41 L24 O3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0312896214550532 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:41:y:2016:i:3:p:459-483

DOI: 10.1177/0312896214550532

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().