 Mandatory accounting change and debt covenant violation: Additional evidence from SFAS 150Dean Hanlon Australian Journal of Management, 2019, vol. 44, issue 3, 355-387 Abstract: This study examines whether managers, in response to the liability classification of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (MRPS) under SFAS 150: Accounting for financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity , restructure MRPS outstanding to keep debt off the balance sheet and, consequently, avoid increasingly likely debt covenant violation. Findings of this study show an economically and statistically significant association between MRPS restructuring and the likelihood of firms violating leverage covenant constraints, given firms reduce, on average, reported MRPS by USD259,688 for every 1 percentage point increase in leverage covenant tightness. No evidence exists of an association between MRPS restructuring and the presence of a debt covenant constraint that will be tightened by the debt classification of MRPS, or firms’ pre-adoption proximity to covenant violation. Overall, these findings help resolve conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of proxies used in prior studies to capture managers’ concerns about covenant violation due to a mandatory accounting change. JEL classifications: M41 Keywords: Debt covenant violation; hybrid securities; interest coverage covenants; leverage covenants; mandatory accounting change (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:44:y:2019:i:3:p:355-387 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.