EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Executive evaluative ambivalence: A more balanced look

Scott Julian, Tamme Quinn-Grzebyk and Ayse Karaca
Additional contact information
Tamme Quinn-Grzebyk: Wayne State University, Mike Ilitch School of Business, USA
Ayse Karaca: Kutahya Dumlupinar University, Turkey

Australian Journal of Management, 2025, vol. 50, issue 3, 962-984

Abstract: Executive evaluative ambivalence influences how firms act and respond to strategic issues but research on what is associated with such ambivalence has languished. Prior research focused on perspective complexity to the relative neglect of diagnostic effort, leaving imbalanced our understanding of not only executive evaluative ambivalence, but also issue diagnosis and sensemaking in general. Considering factors relating to both the subject of diagnosis (executives) and the object of diagnosis (the strategic issue), we test our hypotheses with pre-existing data addressing how executives evaluated a period of economic environmental equivocality. We find that executive job demands and perceived issue time pressure exhibited inverted-U relationships, and that a higher proportion of external executives and a narrower target market focus exhibited positive relationships, with executive evaluative ambivalence. We also confirm and extend previous perspective complexity research and close by addressing implications for research and practice. JEL Classification: M10, M12, M19

Keywords: Diagnostic effort; evaluative ambivalence; issue interpretation; upper echelons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03128962241282025 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:50:y:2025:i:3:p:962-984

DOI: 10.1177/03128962241282025

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-04
Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:50:y:2025:i:3:p:962-984