Explaining Structural Change in Organisations: Contingency Determinism or Contingency Fit

Lex Donaldson
Additional contact information
Lex Donaldson: Australian Graduate School of Management.

Australian Journal of Management, 1984, vol. 9, issue 2, 15-24

Abstract: Cross-sectional studies of organisation have yielded a number of relationships between contingencies and structure. However, some diachronic studies of changes in contingency and structure have not produced the results expected. The suggestion of this paper is that this may reflect inappropriate forms of data analysis based on a theoretical orientation of contingency determinism rather than contingency-fit. The former posits that a change in contingency directly causes a change in structure. The latter states that it is the lack of fit, a mismatch between contingency and structure, which leads to structural change. An illustration of the two alternative approaches is given by reference to longitudinal data on changes in strategy and structure. Two hypotheses derived from the contingency-fit model are confirmed, whereas the one derived from the contingency determinism approach is not.

Keywords: CONTINGENCY MODELS; ORGANISATION STRUCTURE; DIVERSIFICATION; ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1984
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628400900202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:9:y:1984:i:2:p:15-24

DOI: 10.1177/031289628400900202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Management from Australian School of Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().