The Trade-Offs of Fighting and Investing: A Model of the Evolution of War and Peace1
Kelly M. Kadera and
Daniel S. Morey
Additional contact information
Kelly M. Kadera: University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa, USA
Daniel S. Morey: University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky, USA, daniel-morey@uky.edu
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2008, vol. 25, issue 2, 152-170
Abstract:
International competition occurs in many different forms. Just as a state would be in danger if it allowed its opponent to gain a military advantage, one that falls behind a rival in an economic contest similarly faces risks. States must weigh the trade-offs between economic and military growth, as well as deciding on the best strategy to follow should war erupt. We use a formal, dynamic model to explicitly capture the trade-offs that states face in their search for security and dominance. The deductions from the model demonstrate that by considering the long-run results of a peacetime rivalry, weaker states might conclude that their only hope of winning or surviving a rivalry lies in fighting a counterforce war, explain why and how stalemates evolve during counterforce wars, and indicate that targeting industrial objectives shortens the duration of wars.
Keywords: competition; dynamic model; strategy; trade-offs; war (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/07388940802007272 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:25:y:2008:i:2:p:152-170
DOI: 10.1080/07388940802007272
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().