Legal Systems and Peaceful Attempts to Resolve Territorial Disputes
Emilia Justyna Powell and
Krista E. Wiegand
Additional contact information
Emilia Justyna Powell: University of Alabama, USA, emiliapowell@georgiasouthern.edu
Krista E. Wiegand: Georgia Southern University, USA, kwiegand@georgiasouthern.edu
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2010, vol. 27, issue 2, 129-151
Abstract:
This paper focuses on how domestic legal systems influence states’ choices of peaceful dispute resolution methods. In order to increase familiarity with rules of peaceful resolution of disputes, states use their domestic legal systems to provide them with clues about the most trustworthy ways to settle disputes. States tend to choose methods of dispute resolution that are similar to those embedded in their domestic legal systems. Empirical analyses support the conjecture of a linkage between domestic law and interstate conflict management methods, showing that civil law dyads prefer more legalized dispute resolution methods compared to common law dyads. Islamic law dyads are most likely to use nonbinding third party methods, while common law dyads tend to resolve their territorial disputes through bilateral negotiations.
Keywords: adjudication; dispute resolution; legal system; negotiations; territorial dispute (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894209343979 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:27:y:2010:i:2:p:129-151
DOI: 10.1177/0738894209343979
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().