All Conflict is Local

Siri Camilla Aas Rustad, Halvard Buhaug, Ã…shild Falch and Scott Gates
Additional contact information
Siri Camilla Aas Rustad: Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), PRIO; Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), sirir@prio.no
Halvard Buhaug: Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), PRIO
Ã…shild Falch: Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), PRIO
Scott Gates: Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), PRIO; Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2011, vol. 28, issue 1, 15-40

Abstract: Most quantitative assessments of civil conflict draw on annual country-level data to determine a baseline hazard of conflict onset. The first problem with such analyses is that they ignore factors associated with the precipitation of violence, such as elections and natural disasters and other trigger mechanisms. Given that baseline hazards are relatively static, most of the temporal variation in risk is associated with such precipitating factors. The second problem with most quantitative analyses of conflict is that they assume that civil conflicts are distributed uniformly throughout the country. This is rarely the case; most intrastate armed conflicts take place in the periphery of the country, well away from the capital and often along international borders. Analysts fail to disaggregate temporally as well as spatially. While other contributions to this issue focus on the temporal aspect of conflict, this article addresses the second issue: the spatial resolution of analysis. To adequately assess the baseline risk of armed conflict, this article develops a unified prediction model that combines a quantitative assessment of conflict risk at the country level with country-specific sub-national analyses at first-order administrative regions. Geo-referenced data on aspects of social, economic, and political exclusion, as well as endemic poverty and physical geography, are featured as the principal local indicators of latent conflict. Using Asia as a test case, this article demonstrates the unique contribution of applying a localized approach to conflict prediction that explicitly captures sub-national variation in civil conflict risk.

Keywords: Asia; civil war; disaggregation; forecasting; Geographic Information System; GIS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894210388122 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:28:y:2011:i:1:p:15-40

DOI: 10.1177/0738894210388122

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().