Authoritarian regimes and civil–military relations: Explaining counterbalancing in autocracies
Abel Escribà -Folch,
Tobias Böhmelt and
Ulrich Pilster
Additional contact information
Abel Escribà -Folch: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
Tobias Böhmelt: University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Ulrich Pilster: University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2020, vol. 37, issue 5, 559-579
Abstract:
How do autocracies structure their civil–military relations? We contend that personalist dictators are more strongly associated with counterbalancing than other authoritarian regime types. Personalists are characterized by weak institutions and narrow support bases, a lack of unifying ideologies and informal links to the ruler. They thus have strong incentives to coup-proof and, as we contend, counterbalancing seems particularly attractive. Quantitative analyses of autocratic regimes’ counterbalancing efforts since the 1960s provide support for this expectation. By showing that institutional coup-proofing significantly varies across autocratic forms of government, we contribute to the literature on comparative authoritarianism and civil–military relations.
Keywords: Autocracies; civil–military relations; counterbalancing; coup-proofing; quantitative analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894219836285 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:37:y:2020:i:5:p:559-579
DOI: 10.1177/0738894219836285
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().