The lesser evil? Experimental evidence on the strength of nuclear and chemical weapon “taboosâ€

Michal Smetana, Marek Vranka and Ondrej Rosendorf
Additional contact information
Michal Smetana: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Czech Republic
Marek Vranka: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Czech Republic
Ondrej Rosendorf: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Czech Republic

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2023, vol. 40, issue 1, 3-21

Abstract: We present findings of a survey experiment on a sample of 2350 American and British citizens, in which we examined attitudes towards nuclear and chemical strikes. Our findings demonstrate that even though the public accurately judges nuclear weapons as more destructive and indiscriminate, it is still more averse to the use of chemical than nuclear weapons. Our follow up study has shown that individuals are significantly more likely to associate chemical weapons with “rogue states†and terrorists, and associate nuclear weapons with modern powers. The findings contribute to scholarship on the “taboos†surrounding the (non-)use of WMDs in world politics.

Keywords: Chemical taboo; nuclear taboo; public attitudes; survey experiment; weapons of mass destruction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942221124515 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:3-21

DOI: 10.1177/07388942221124515

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().