Human rights organizations and transitional justice agenda-setting: Evidence from peace agreement provisions

Sam R. Bell and Risa Kitagawa
Additional contact information
Sam R. Bell: 5308University at Buffalo, SUNY, USA
Risa Kitagawa: 1848Northeastern University, USA

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2023, vol. 40, issue 1, 65-87

Abstract: How do human rights organizations (HROs) shape transitional justice policy in countries emerging from conflict? We investigate this question in the context of peace processes, a vital stage when many key post-conflict policies are determined. Using granular data on the content of peace agreements, we show that the robust presence of HROs significantly increases the likelihood of provisions promising criminal accountability for wartime abuses. Yet this association is conditional on prior ratification of international human rights instruments and the existence of impartial third parties in the peace process—background factors that lower barriers to effective HRO advocacy. These findings reveal a novel pathway through which HROs secure transitional justice on the national agenda after conflict.

Keywords: Civil society; human rights; non-governmental organizations (NGOs); peace agreements; transitional justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942221104032 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:65-87

DOI: 10.1177/07388942221104032

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().