Rainfall shocks and state repression: How rainfall shocks incentivize governments to commit human rights abuses

Benjamin J Appel and Nathaniel C Smith
Additional contact information
Benjamin J Appel: 8784University of California San Diego, USA
Nathaniel C Smith: Nebraska Wesleyan University, USA

Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2025, vol. 42, issue 5, 488-513

Abstract: We posit that rainfall shocks have an indirect effect on state repression through their impact on food production. Rainfall shocks are associated with reduced food production, which can generate grievances among the populace while also creating incentives for them to mobilize against the regime. In turn, governments employ repression to insulate themselves from these adverse climatic events. We also argue that this relationship is most pronounced in developing states. Analyses are conducted using causal mediation analysis on a global sample of states from 1992 to 2015. We find support for our argument; rainfall shocks have an indirect effect on repression by first reducing food production. We also find that rainfall shocks only have a systematic impact on state repression in developing countries.

Keywords: State repression; climate change; rainfall shocks; causal mediation analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942241280702 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:5:p:488-513

DOI: 10.1177/07388942241280702

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Conflict Management and Peace Science from Peace Science Society (International)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().