The Contradictions of Business Unionism and the Decline of Organized Labour

Ian M. Taplin
Additional contact information
Ian M. Taplin: Wake Forest University

Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1990, vol. 11, issue 2, 249-278

Abstract: This paper deals with some of the problems associated with institutionalized collective bargaining in the US. During the twentieth century this has invariably taken shape around contests over wages or distributive issues. This paper argues that such a preoccupation is largely the result of organizational and institutional imperatives that have impelled unions and management to deal with tangible, incremental issues that are not threatening the conventional assumptions about the capitalist work process. After identifying the saliency of contractual formalism in collective bargaining, the author shows how unions as organizational entities more often than not have impeded rank-and-file input into centralized policy-making and ignored worker concerns over non-economic issues. Consequently, labour-capital conflicts have often occurred outside of the established parameters over issues such as work rules and on-the-job decision-making.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X90112006 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:11:y:1990:i:2:p:249-278

DOI: 10.1177/0143831X90112006

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic and Industrial Democracy from Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().